Recent infectious disease outbreaks have encouraged actions to strengthen global preparedness and response measures for naturally occurring outbreaks. Still, relatively little research has been done on the global community’s capacity to prepare and respond to the deliberate release of biological agents. Though there are clear parallels between the actions required for a response to natural outbreaks and the deliberate use of a biological agent, standard outbreak activities may be hindered or altered by the criminal nature of a deliberate biological event. Additionally, contrasted to the field of nuclear and radiological warfare where the responsibilities of lead agencies are fairly straightforward, there are a large number of United Nations and other international agencies that may have full or partial mandates to engage in the response to a biological event.
Because the coordination between different stakeholders is crucial to an efficient response, and because it remains unclear to what extent the deliberate nature of such an incident would affect the international response, our team has prepared the tools below to help clarify and conceptualize what a response to a deliberate biological event could entail.
This resource is a living document. If you have suggestions, edits, or additional links, please email Matt Boyce with your revisions and any relevant references.
This tool describes how a deliberate biological outbreak might unfold, including the stakeholders who would be involved in identifying, responding to, and recovering from the event, and the policies that govern these efforts. Policy documents are identified as they become relevant during a notional event timeline, and those documents are linked to the stakeholders who draw their mandates from each policy document. The functional roles for each stakeholder are also identified, including affected and non-affected member States, UN and other international organizations, local and international NGOs, and private sector organizations would play as the event progresses.
Katz R, Graeden E, Abe K, Attal-Juncqua A, Boyce MR, Eaneff S. (2018). Mapping Stakeholders and Policies in Response to Deliberate Biological Events. Heliyon, 4(12), e01091.
In February 2019, in advance of the 2019 Munich Security Conference, the Center for Global Health Science & Security and partners from NTI, the Center for Global Development, and Talus Analytics convened a tabletop exercise with senior leaders geared toward identifying gaps and making recommendations to improve the global system for responding to deliberate biological events.
This library compiled by the Center for Global Health Science and Security is intended to provide users with a comprehensive list of documents and mandates outlining the responsibilities of various UN agencies, NGOs, and IOs in the response to a DBE.
2018 BWC Meetings of Experts Materials
BWC | 2018 Meetings of Experts
Attal-Juncqua A, Boyce MR, Katz R. (2018). White Paper: Assistance Following a Deliberate Biological Event: Operationalizing Article VII of the Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention. Washington: Georgetown Center for Global Health Science & Security.
International Coordination for Deliberate Biological Events Presentation | Ellie Graeden, Talus Analytics & CGHSS
Assistance Following a Deliberate Biological Event Presentation | Aurelia Attal-Juncqua, CGHSS
Senior Level TTX on a Deliberate Biological Event Presentation | Michelle Nalabandian, NTI | bio
Global Biosecurity Dialogue Presentation | Hayley Severance, NTI | bio
Zanders JP. (2018). The Meaning of 'Emergency Assistance’: Origins and negotiation of Article VII of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. Ferney-Voltaire: The Trench.
For questions, comments, or other inquiries about this line of work, please contact email@example.com.